tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3522311.post2962651935680899599..comments2024-03-12T03:23:42.976-04:00Comments on NeuroDojo: Sharp edges and soft scienceZen Faulkeshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07811309183398223358noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3522311.post-45155311906429904792011-02-03T19:17:31.057-05:002011-02-03T19:17:31.057-05:00thanks for writing an article showing the other si...thanks for writing an article showing the other side for a change<br /><br />i think its strange how a bunch of people just said its "cutting in" and then nobody seems to think any differently or question it. its scary how much people will believe if they see the word neuroscience close by. <br />isnt something like that really just subjective anyway? from where im looking its clearly not cutting into it but just behind the p.where has the p been cut? they are two dimensional shapes right? so if the square did cut into the p then there would be part of the p would just fall off. have they not read Flatland?!!<br />i mean if they were 3 dimensional shapes then yes, you could see from the side that it had cut into it but thats not the case with this. <br />either way, it could be the worst logo ever (does anybody else smell a publicity stunt?)Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08383557571902309928noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3522311.post-26897148364088546692010-10-25T06:46:17.539-04:002010-10-25T06:46:17.539-04:00Thanks for throwing some cold water on that stupid...Thanks for throwing some cold water on that stupid article.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02765663606681787142noreply@blogger.com