30 October 2013
Save the Day essays #2: Recovery
›
I went to a Doctor Who convention in 1986. John Nathan-Turner, then producer of the show, was asked about efforts to recover the old missin...
3 comments:
29 October 2013
Tuesday Crustie: Nibbles
›
Yes, there are crustaceans in this picture. Enlarge and look closely at the second and third toes from the left... Photo by Michela Simon...
28 October 2013
Save The Day essays #1: Restoration
›
My “Save the Day” essays will be a series celebrating the fiftieth anniversary of Doctor Who , which is less than a month away. I didn’t...
25 October 2013
How common is “co-first” authorship?
›
Deciphering authorship of scientific papers is an esoteric task. Something that raises red flags for those in the tribe of science (like 300...
1 comment:
23 October 2013
That’s the best evidence for a STEM shorage?
›
The National Math and Science Initiative blog claims there is a STEM crisis. We just aren’t producing enough skilled STEM graduates, it cla...
1 comment:
22 October 2013
Tuesday Crustie: Venom
›
Bonus Tuesday Crustie! Because breaking crustacean news! I’ve featured remipedes before, because they are cool in many ways. They are cav...
Tuesday Crustie: Better than Darjeeling or Earl Grey
›
From here. Hat tip to Craig McLain and Andrew Thaler
21 October 2013
Do you know what your professor does?
›
Last week, I gave a talk on research culture, about which I shall write more later. I wanted was feedback from people who work with or hir...
2 comments:
16 October 2013
Today in “What the hell is wrong with people?”: Me
›
Science blogger Danielle Lee was on the receiving end of bad behaviour. On the other hand, science blogger Bora Zivcovic engaged in bad beh...
Using “journal sting” papers for teaching
›
Say what you will about John Bohannon’s Science article about dodgy peer review , he’s done a service by getting people talking about prob...
Comments for first half of October 2013
›
Christina’s LIS rant looks at the journal sting conducted by Science magazine. The journal sting is also the subject of Brian Wood’s Hu...
15 October 2013
Tuesday Crustie: Ice blue
›
This lovely little caldoceran Moina macrocopus has a frosty colour. Photo by PROYECTO AGUA** /** WATER PROJECT on Flickr ; used under a ...
14 October 2013
Initial reactions: can we hide the sex of authors? And should we?
›
Maliniak and colleagues (2013) have found an important fact: if a paper in international relations has only female authors, it will be cited...
2 comments:
12 October 2013
Today in “What the hell is wrong with people?”: Danielle Lee’s story
›
Danielle Lee is someone the blogosphere, and science, and science writing, needs a lot more of: smart, passionate, articulate. Can never ha...
08 October 2013
Journal sting a black eye for Thomson Reuters
›
I’m grateful to Brian Wood on the Human Ecology blog for analyzing some of the data from Science magazine’s journal sting . He was curio...
1 comment:
Tuesday Crustie: Shimmer
›
This is a little cladorceran named Ceriodaphnia reticulata , if I’m translating the caption correctly. Photo by PROYECTO AGUA** /** WAT...
1 comment:
07 October 2013
Should you review for a journal that would never publish your work?
›
Dr. 24 Hours tweeted : Asked to review for the #1 theory journal in my field! A journal that will NEVER publish my work. DrugMonkey sai...
2 comments:
04 October 2013
CVs versus résumés
›
There’s a lot of variation in people’s understanding about how to convey information about your past work experiences in academia. First, ...
03 October 2013
Open access or vanity press, the
Science
“sting” edition
›
Earlier this year, I co-moderated a panel at Science Online about open access. To me, it was about the reputation economy in science, and ho...
5 comments:
02 October 2013
Sasquatch paper available, but not through the journal
›
Just a quickie: Jon Tennant reports that the sasquatch DNA paper I blogged about previously is now available for all . It is not on the j...
‹
›
Home
View web version