A few months ago, I published a submitted but not completed article on paying peer reviewers here on the blog and on Figshare. This got me digging around in folders on my hard drive and I got thinking about other articles that I had written, submitted, but weren’t accepted. And at the time, I just ran out of steam to revise and resubmit them in ways that would satisfy an editor and a couple of reviewers.
So in recent weeks, I have taken to submitting some of those manuscripts to a preprint server.
In the past, I was a little cool to the value of preprints. I always thought they had some uses, but I was skeptical that they would replace journals, which was the stated wish for some of the strongest preprint advocates.
But since I last wrote about preprints, the attention landscape
has changed. More people in biology have started scanning through preprint servers part of their routine. I was surprised when a reporter emailed me about one of these preprints and wanted to chat for an interview. I don’t think that would have happened a few years ago.
Whether these will be “final” public version of these little projects, I can’t say. I have other projects that I want to get out that have not been written up at all yet that I want to try to get into a journal. But I am glad that every one of these received at least a little attention on Bluesky.
- Trends in hoaxes of academic communication. 🔊 Audio summary
- Uninterpretable graphs at a scientific conference. 🔊 Audio summary
- When crayfish make news, headlines are correct but still misleading. 🔊 Audio summary:
Related posts
A pre-print experiment: will anyone notice?
A pre-print experiment, continued
A pre-print experiment, part 3: Someone did notice
Photo by umjadedoan on Flickr. Used under a Creative Commons license.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated. Real names and pseudonyms are welcome. Anonymous comments are not and will be removed.