25 March 2025
A second test of paid peer review
›
After years of sloganeering, it’s interesting to see two trials of paid peer review coming on the heels of one another. The latest test of p...
17 March 2025
A test of pay for peer review
›
“Pay reviewers” has become a social media slogan that could be a welcome change to academic publishing if potential pitfalls are avoided . B...
18 February 2025
How to shape public opinion
›
Shana Gadarian just wrote this useful thread on Bluesky . I’ve compiled it with some light editing. Some brief thoughts from someone who st...
The missing science solidarity
›
So. In the United States, funding for science has slowed, mass layoffs have cut through federal science agencies like a chainsaw, and someon...
11 February 2025
These are not serious people
›
An American politician with a seat in the House of Representatives has introduced a resolution “to acquire Greenland and to rename Greenland...
#ArsenicLife in soft focus
›
I am glad to hear that Felisa Wolfe-Simon is doing well and still loves science. But lots of other information in a new article in the New Y...
Subtleties of sex in sticklebacks
›
Daniel Bolnick wrote a thread on Bluesky about the biology of sex that I thought would make a great blog post. So I saved him the trouble an...
10 February 2025
Scientific societies are failing the moment by scrubbing diversity from their websites without explanation
›
I called last week, “The worst week for science ever.” Of course, it was just the worst week so far . This morning, I saw reports of two lar...
07 February 2025
Worst week for science
ever
›
Sunday : American Society for Microbiology scrubs mentions of diversity from their websites. Tuesday : NASA stops everything to scrub mentio...
05 February 2025
Untitled post 2025-02-05
›
The United States has doused itself in gasoline and lit a match. The only question is whether the fire can be put out with no more than scor...
›
Home
View web version