data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b5e9/2b5e9043c4e7d96b0ba8299dee4b861e88862458" alt="ResearchBlogging.org"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23787/23787662eea8f44d07d01e9f3d3f5ac36458ca52" alt="This post was chosen as an Editor's Selection for ResearchBlogging.org"
As I talked about in an earlier post, weird things happen to the size of species on islands. Big species get small. Small species get big.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e30c/6e30cb2cb9d1940828014134849be5eed8f44a37" alt=""
Are all these things – living on islands, the large size, the small range the animals occupy – all connected somehow? That is, did Komodo dragons start out as Komodo wyverns (small dragons) and evolve large size because they were on these small islands? Alternately, did Komodo dragons evolve from “Widely distributed South Pacific” dragons, meaning they were just big from the start?
A new paper by Hucknall and colleagues tries to tease out these possibilities, and suggests that the Komodo dragons’ island home isn’t all that related to their size.
Hucknall and company get to say, “We have the fossils. We win.”
Somewhat to my surprise, Komodo dragons have a fossil record that goes back a good long while. The authors here have fossil going back almost a million years, in fact. Most of this paper is classic comparative vertebrate anatomy; lots of notes of condyles and grooves and the like.
These Kododo dragon fossils are found not just on smallish islands where the species lives now... but on mainland Australia. And the ones in Australia are actually the oldest fossils. Because these fossils are recognizable as the same species, and the fossil timeline starts on the mainland and continues to the islands, the evidence does not support a scenario where the ancestors of the Komodos were little dwarfs that got bigger once they reached the islands.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d087d/d087df0e17c6af2e72b006f42e34f1b0e0209085" alt="Varanid evolution and geography"
The sad news is that the range, population, and number of species of these lizards are all ghosts of their former selves. We value these animals enough that they will probably be kept in zoos indefinitely, but it would be a shame if that became the only place they lived.
Reference
Hocknull, S., Piper, P., van den Bergh, G., Due, R., Morwood, M., & Kurniawan, I. (2009). Dragon's Paradise Lost: Palaeobiogeography, Evolution and Extinction of the Largest-Ever Terrestrial Lizards (Varanidae) PLoS ONE, 4 (9) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007241
No comments:
Post a Comment