You can do that fast, right? You don’t even have to count.
In comparison, as fast as you can, how many dots?
That’s much trickier, isn’t it? Slower. You have to count.
The first, “at a glance” way of determining the number of things is called subitizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b5e9/2b5e9043c4e7d96b0ba8299dee4b861e88862458" alt="ResearchBlogging.org"
And, for an added twist, they looked at how the behaviour changed over time. Little (one day) guppies were able to tell 3 from 4... but not 4 from 8. Or even 4 from 12! “Four” seems to be the breaking point. Adult guppies, however, can tell 4 from 12. This suggests that these fish have a mechanism for distinguishing small numbers, but not larger ones, even when the differences between the numbers are substantial.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e850d/e850dddcaa84ba44c5d79c68b72a06fb439d8072" alt=""
You might argue that this doesn’t represent counting in any real sense – this could just be amount of “visual space” that objects represent. That is, guppies distinguish large from small. The researchers tried to control for that, using a tank set-up so that the lone fish being tested could only see one other fish at a time. That seems to eliminate “size” as a proxy for counting.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c94bb/c94bbaa8a0ddb193898065014b4ceaceb69bc890" alt=""
P.S.—There are 23 dots in the second picture.
Reference
Bisazza A, Piffer L, Serena G, & Agrillo C. 2010. Ontogeny of numerical abilities in fish. PLoS ONE 5(11): e15516. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015516
Photo by Tartaruga33 on Flickr. Used under a Creative Commons license.
No comments:
Post a Comment