Last year, I was hoping to break my record for most original papers. I tied it, with three papers. This year, I broke it.
Actually, shattered might be more apt than broke. Or maybe smithereened.
I had five data-driven papers, an ethics paper, and a chapter in Open Lab 2010. Six original peer-reviewed papers, and a book chapter that was more heavily vetted than any of the papers. A couple, though, were things that had been in the pipeline for a long time – some my fault, some not. They probably should have been out earlier.
And then there was #SciFund.
That’s still pretty productive. And it was made possible by hard working students and collaborations. As I wrote before, it was great to have two papers on subjects that I never in a million years expected to be publishing on (ecological modeling and parasitology).
The downside to having a great year is that you know you’re not going to top it next year. While I don’t have the same momentum going into 2012 as I did for 2011, I have a few things lined up for next year already. There’s the symposium for the tenth International Congress for Neuroethology; the Manuscript That Will Not Die finally seems to have left my desk for the last time and is in press; and I’ve got a paper in the hands of an editor being reviewed right now.
Maybe I’m finally getting the hand of this science thing.
Friday, December 30, 2011
All downhill from here?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)




0 comments:
Post a Comment