I had the great fun of talking to Ivan Baxer and Liz Haswell for The TapRoot podcast!
We chatted about my two most recent contributions: a paper on authorship disputes, and my letter to Science about grad programs dropping the Graduate Record Exam (GRE). When I wrote those two articles, I didn’t have any connecting thread between them, but I found one for this roundtable:
(N)othing in academia makes sense except in light of assessment and how awful it is.
(And yes, I’m channeling Theodosius Dobzhansky via Randy Olsen.)
Confession time: I had never listened to Taproot until Ivan contacted me about being on the show. To prepare, I listened to a bunch of episodes. I became increasingly excited about the prospect of being one of the guests. Because The Taproot a damn good podcast. The discussion is great and the production values are excellent.
If you are a scientist, I recommend subscribing to The TapRoot – and not just because I’m on it! It’s on all the usual subscription services.
The recording process was not easy, though. Because I was mostly working at home at the time, we tried a test run of recording using my home wifi. Horrible. Awful delays, choppy audio, and just generally unusable audio.
Then I went to my university and used that wifi. You would think an institutional signal in the middle of summer with low use would be better, but nope. It seemed to be an issue with my particular laptop.
We finally solved the problem by using a LAN cable. I can’t remember the last time I had to use a physical cable to connect to the internet, but the old tech still works!
The screenshot is from audio editor JuniperKiss, who did a great job of making me sound more articulate than I am.
Please give the pod a listen or a read, since there’s a full transcript available!
P.S.—I mentioned in this interview that my department wanted to move away from using the GRE. That was no initiated by me, since I stepped down as our graduate program coordinator a while ago.
Dropping the GRE was the plan. I learned after this episode was recorded that our department’s attempt to drop the GRE as an admissions requirement was blocked by administrators up the chain. I think, but an not sure, that it was the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board. As I understood it, they wanted data to show that the GRE was not predictive of success in our program.
I was surprised, because there are no shortage of peer-reviewed papers on this, some of which I cited in my #GRExit letter in Science. BUt I maybe should not have been surprised, since the Coordinating Board had required some master’s programs in my university add the GRE a few years ago.
I wonder why there is this desire to keep the GRE at the state level.
P.P.S.—I’m sorry I said “guys” as a generic for people.
External links
Taproot S4E2: The GRExit and how we choose who goes to grad school
Taproot Season 4, Episode 2 transcript
The TapRoot on Stitcher
The TapRoot on iTunes
No comments:
Post a Comment