In this YouTube video, “9 circles of hell of a scientific paper publishing, or the world is full of non-elephants,” one of my less pleasant publication stories come up as an example of less than ideal publication processes.
Excerpt from video:
It took almost 3 years to publish an article compared to two years of doing the research in sand crabs. Unfortunately, I am even not able to to check out this article, as it is pay walled for ten dollars. Of course this case is extreme but sometimes even two, three, four months are crucial not only for scientists’ career but also for the impact and relevance of this research for the society that actually paid for it.The video also features Björn Brembs, who’s consistently been one of the best commentators of academic publishing.
External links
Related posts
1,017 days: when publishing the paper takes longer than the project
No comments:
Post a Comment